Tuesday 28 August 2012

The Hangover

It was somewhere about 4pm when the weariness and the ennui washed over me in a great grey dreary wave that nearly had me retreating off to my bed.  As bank holiday weekends go it hadn’t been a bad one up until that point.  No one had forced me to attend a rock festival, the garden was looking presentable enough for me to justifiably neglect it for another week and a major European war hadn’t broken out.

The best way to see London is from riding on the top deck of a bus and, as there was little point in getting to Holland Park before 10am on Saturday morning and every point in setting off out early, before the cheap-ticket buying families filled up the trains, I caught the No.10 from outside St Pancras and relaxed as it bore me across Bloomsbury, along Oxford Street and Park Lane, through Knightsbridge and on into the easy affluence of W14.

Leighton House, former home of the artist Lord Leighton RA and now a National Trust property, is well worth a fiver and an hour or so of your time, most of all for the Arab Hall, festooned in the plundered tiles of Syria and Mesopotamia.  The rest of the house is interesting enough, as an exhibit of late-Victorian taste, a theme which was sustained as I detoured off from my walk back through The Park towards the West End to admire once more the unashamed garishness of the Albert Memorial.  The sun had emerged from behind the clouds by this point and was beating down so fiercely by the time that I got to Hyde Park Corner that I boarded a bus again rather than face the slight but steady slope all the way back up Piccadilly and Shaftsbury Avenue to the cinema.

Take This Waltz, by the Canadian director Sarah Polley, is hard to categorise.  Perhaps it’s an anti rom-com, being about infidelity and dissatisfaction and with an (implied) unhappy ending.  It is almost very good.  There are some wonderful scenes of the intimacy of the marriage between Michelle Williams and Seth Rogan and of the burgeoning attraction between Williams and neighbour Luke Kirby but these are let down by some unsatisfactorily slip-shod plotting.

I had intended to meet up with an old pal but he was otherwise occupied with an outbreak of, literal, madness in the family and it seemed as though I may as well head off back home when I bumped into a friend of a friend outside the British Museum and we adjourned to a nearby hostelry where one pint turned to two, then three, then four…

All the same, I got myself into a reasonable gear on the Sunday morning, read the newspaper over coffee, went around the shops, had a light lunch, came home and baked a lemon cake and did sufficient housework to make the place vaguely presentable in advance of my visitors.

Absinthe has got something of a bad reputation, not least for tasting like a particularly unpleasant medicine.  “This is the real stuff, with wormwood in it,” said A, as he gleefully burned a mixture of spirit and sugar in a spoon.  It looked like the preparation of Crack to me and I did voice a mild objection that maybe it was a little early in the evening to be getting quite so hard-core.  In retrospect he was right and I was wrong.  I wouldn’t have cared to have anyone trying to go through that performance of flame and spoon later on, after all the brandy and vodka and beer and limoncello of this ‘Gentleman’s evening’: bits of the house would have quite likely caught fire and I wouldn’t have cared for that at all.

It was a fine night of conversation and intoxication, of tall tales and a setting of the world to rights through to the wee small hours of the morning and me kicking the Dorian-Grey-portrait-in-the-attic (i.e. haggard) D’s feet and telling him to “Wake up and fuck off.  I want to go bed.”

The next morning wasn’t half as bad as it might have been.  I was hardly full of beans but I didn’t feel as dreadful as I righteously ought to have done.  It was only when a sudden rain shower sent me scurrying back inside from the presentable enough garden, where I’d breakfasted on strong tea and muffins in my dressing gown, that I realised that this was because I was still mildly pissed.  This is a state of affairs that I usually try to avoid getting into when I have to go to work the next day: last night’s still-active alcohol can, I think, act as a terrible truth serum and there are very few workplaces that thrive upon the expression of unvarnished truth, least of all mine.  As it was, a wet Bank Holiday Monday allowed the re-entry procedure back to sobriety to take its own unforced course and it was just a matter of trying to cushion the landing as much as possible, through showering and snacks and small but somehow pleasing chores easily broken down into chunks such as washing up and drying and putting the bins out and the one (absolutely singular and wholly medicinal) beer to ease the pain.

Kingsley Amis memorably described the early stages of the hangover in Lucky Jim:

‘Dixon was alive again.  Consciousness was upon him before he could get out of the way; not for him the slow, gracious wandering from the halls of sleep, but a summary, forcible ejection.  He lay sprawled, too wicked to move, spewed up like a broken spider-crab on the tarry shingle of the morning.  The light did him harm, but not as much as looking at things did; he resolved, having done it once, never to move his eye-balls again.  A dusty thudding in his head made the scene before him beat like a pulse.  His mouth had been used as a latrine by some small creature of the night, and then as its mausoleum.  During the night, too, he’d somehow been on a cross-country run and then been expertly beaten up by secret police.  He felt bad.’

Amis also philosophised, in his collected On Drinking, on the Metaphysical Hangover and on hangover reading and listening:

‘I suggest Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's One Day In The Life Of Ivan Denisovich. Its picture of life in a Russian labour camp will tell you that there are plenty of people who have a bloody sight more to put up with than you (or I) have or ever will have, and who put up with it, if not cheerfully, at any rate in no mood of self-pity’.

As I happened, I turned to a recent purchase: Roger Lewis’s splendidly curmudgeonly What Am I Still Doing Here and chuckled my way through the day, and even through the 4pm crisis of faith, with this to the accompaniment of Louis Armstrong’s Hot Fives and Sevens, recordings that it are simply impossible to be unhappy to.  Curmudgeoning apart, Lewis’s manifesto, Now here’s what I call poetry, from when he stood as candidate for Professor of Poetry at Oxford, is featured in the book, though he erred seriously in omitting Armstrong.

Dr Lewis is also the author of biographies of Peter Sellers (1000 pages of what a completely maniacal shit he was), the immortal Charles Hawtrey, and Anthony Burgess.  I gave up on the Sellers half way though, confounded by the unrelenting shitty-ness of the man, but the Burgess biography (again, a madman) is a laugh-a-minute favourite that I’ve returned to again and again, each time an utter joy. 

And so the long day waned…

Thursday 23 August 2012

Anthony Powell - excerpts from A Writer's Notebook

For sixty years, Anthony Powell kept a working notebook, a collection of quotations, phrases, observations and ideas for book titles that he thought worth preserving and that he wanted to record and on occasion return to.  It has been a bedside book of mine for a while and what follows is a selection of particular favourites:

Assignations in the London Library.

She wrote in a large untidy hand, like that of a vicious child.

They discuss mineral waters as people do wine.

There was an elderly man who looked as if he might have held a commission in the Romanian Army Service Corps.

A is having an affair with B’s wife, and tries to teach her habits of punctuality, so that B too shall profit in some way from the situation.

He likes flogging dead horses and live women.

A man explaining yachts to a tart.

A young man has a romantic night with his mistress, but in the morning a workman arrives at a very early hour.

A hunchback being sick.

Some women seem to imagine that one has nothing better to do than to sit up all night listening to anecdotes about their first husband.

I envy you your height, you could wear very loud checks.

‘Shall I sing “Frankie and Johnny”?’  ‘No, anything but that.’

The snobbery of loving fat women.

He was killed playing croquet.

He was with a woman who looked old enough, but by no means ugly enough, to be his mother.

One of the reasons that films are so bad is that producers assume that a class of picture-goer exists, stupider and slower witted and more vulgar than themselves, which would, of course, be impossible.

Tuesday 7 August 2012

Gore Vidal

I was sad to hear that Gore Vidal had died.  Although his declining years were marred by increasingly crackpot pronouncements on 9/11 and Pearl Harbor and the rest, I always retained an affection for the Great American Iconoclast.

It must have been the late lamented South Bank Show that brought him to my attention, sometime in the early 80s, and I was enthralled by this elegantly waspish, seemingly effortlessly learned man who had known everybody.  A friend and I once joked that Vidal was actually the Comte de St Germain. 
 
While bracketing him with that post-war literary flowering of Mailer et al, most of the obits I’ve read seem to conclude that his legacy lies in his essays.  It’s difficult to argue with this, as my much thumbed copy of United States testifies.  His memoir Palimpsest will endure too, I think, as an artefact of the American Century but there are at least three novels that I have paid the compliment of repeated re-reading.

 Julian is probably his best.  Quite apart from the intriguing what-if scenario of a Roman emperor endeavouring to turn back the clock and rescue the classical world from the self-righteous death-cult of Christianity, the first-person narrative approach of letters and extracts from Julian’s memoirs obscures the second-rate characterisation and prose that are all too evident in other novels. 

Burr is often unjustly overlooked, I think, if only for its jaundiced view of the American Revolution and the curiosity of the early years of the unsteady Republic under the Virginian Junta.  I had the novel very much in mind this spring, as I paused en-route to the Staten Island Ferry and took a moment to find Hamilton’s memorial in Trinity Churchyard.

Lincoln succeeds after a fashion, in as far as it humanises, and humourises, the great man but there is a good deal of deadly-dull padding on the home life of the Chase family and the secessionist intriguers fail to be much more than puppets. That said, anyone trying to get a sense of the Civil War could do a lot worse than to read this alongside Doris Kearns’ Team of Rivals and Shelby Foote’s epic trilogy, which I have only recently (finally) got around to.

As for the rest, I never felt tempted by any of his more whimsical entertainments, I put Creation down half-finished and the other one or two Narratives of Empire novels that I picked up left so little impression that I never stirred myself to complete the series.  But he will be missed and Presidential elections will never be quite the same again.