The BBC has begun showing a series of programmes about Punk
Rock – Punk Britannia. So far so
good. The first offering was on the
precursors of Punk – the Bowie/New York Dolls influences and the pub-rock
scene.
I possessed only a cursory knowledge of some of this,
particularly the minutae of pub-rock, so it was both enjoyable and
instructive. As with all TV documentary,
however, it is only when you watch a programme on a topic that you are really
familiar with that you realise the corners cut, the omissions of inconvenient
truths, the unchallenged re-stating of the legend, and the stock-footage
employed out of context. Most other punk
documentaries I have seen have used images of rubbish piling up in the streets
from the Winter of Discontent of 1978-79 to illustrate London circa 1976 in
much the same way as lazy or ignorant producers of documentaries about the
Great War almost always turn to the same bare half-dozen sequences of Tommies
going over the top and of exploding mines to represent any and all points
between 1914 and 1918.
It remains to be seen, then, how good, or bad, the rest of
the series will turn out to be. Well
worth a watch, though, was the feature on TV Smith, one-time singer of The Adverts. A true-punk believer, still
lugging his guitar case about from stage to stage, this treat of a programme
offered a crash course to any budding musician in the tropes of
musical-differences, money worries, bad management, the fickleness of the
music-press, the incompetence of the record-industry and ill-advised cover art.
Aged 9 or 10, Punk was my thing, mine and a few of my school
mates. In retrospect this was more or
less accidental and I might just as easily have become an early adopter of
Disco. But lacking the influence of any
siblings my musical influences were the hand-me-downs of friends’ older
brothers, mediating the NME and Sounds and Melody Maker, and since they were into Punk I inevitably was
too.
I can see now how the
ripple effects of this have affected me down the years. Sticking with Punk and post-Punk and New Wave
and Alternative music through the remainder of my school years inoculated me in
large part to the mainstream culture of the 1980s. It meant that when I first started going out
to clubs and to gigs, when I was 17 or so, I made a beeline for the left-field
and many of the friends that I made then are still my friends now, albeit
rather broader in the beam, with more sensible haircuts and less wild-eyed than
they once were.
The first three singles that I went out and bought for
myself, as opposed to having them bought for me at birthdays and Christmas
were:
Like Clockwork by The Boomtown Rats, bought I remember in
Woolworths in Blackpool;
If the Kids are United by Sham 69;
Identity by X-Ray-Spex.
Classics all, as it turns out, and ones that I wear as
something of a badge of pride. They were
followed, through 1978 and 1979, by singles from Blondie, Generation X, the
wonderful Rezillos, Siouxsie and the Banshees, Buzzcocks, The Undertones, The
Clash and The Pistols, in their, seemingly, final pantomime phase. If this all sounds far too impossibly cool
for someone not even in their teens, I dare say that there were some howlers
too. Even now, I blush at the thought of
having bought a single by The Rich Kids, Glen Matlock’s underwhelming
post-Pistols outfit and the school-yard scorn that descended upon me as a
result.
The past is a foreign country. They did things differently there. The British seventies were lived out in what
was more or less a monoculture. There
were only three TV channels, with a very limited amount of music beyond Top of
the Pops, and really only one radio station – Radio 1. There was the music press too, of course, but
essentially one’s awareness of what was out there, musically, was filtered
through that mainstream heavy gauze. And
in that long-ago age, before free downloads were even thought of, constrained
by the economics of pocket-money, I probably spent a lot of time weighing up
one purchase against another and astutely catching the bus into town in order
to get into Woolworths on the day that the new Top-40 was announced, when those
singles that had dropped out of the chart were marked down in price. The point being that between limited
knowledge and limited purchasing power and the hard critical analysis of the
playground, you were virtually obliged to play the same records over and over
again, to be word perfect in the lyrics, and to damn-well like them, whether
you secretly liked them or not.
Once again under the daunting influence of a friend’s older
brother, the first album that I went
out and bought for myself with my very own money, as opposed to those Christmas
gifts of the K-Tel compilation Music
Explosion and the collected works of Ken Dodd and the Diddymen, was the
first Stranglers album, Rattus Norvegicus.
Whether they were entirely suitable role models for a young
boy or not, what with strippers, heroin, Jet Black always looking like an old fat broken-down biker, and singing about
beating up women, is beside the point.
The Stranglers were my band
for a number of years, through thick and critical thin, until the weight of all
the evidence convinced that they had become irredeemably rubbish. I bought each single as it came out and
played it over and over again, and religiously sat down to watch each Top of
the Pops performance – if video-recorders had been available then I would have
watched them over and over again, and I bought each album as it was released, a
great favourite being No More Heroes.
I came upon Barbara Kingsolver somewhat by chance. I was vaguely aware of her as an author but
wasn’t at all disposed towards picking up one of her books until a trip away
found me bereft of any reading material for the return journey and the friend I
was staying with suggested The Poisonwood Bible.
I tolerated, I’ll say no more than that, this novel about a
Baptist missionary and his family living through the throes of independence of
the Belgian Congo, striving vainly to save the souls of the natives. The narrative structure, with each chapter
rendered in the voice of one or other of the female members of the family, is
interesting enough but I felt that the book would have benefited by being slashed
by 20 or 25%. “I get it!” I wanted to
shout: Big Daddy America in its hubris
sets out to save the world, to shape it in its own image, only to let down itself
and those that it is ostensibly trying to help.
A little while later I mentioned Kingsolver to another
friend who urged me to read The Lacuna.
Now this this
turned out to be something else altogether.
Warm-hearted. A joy to read. Beautifully written. Forget the cliché, I really did not want to
put it down.
As with TPB, there
are layers of narrative, the majority from the diaries of the Mexican-American central
character - Harrison William Shepherd’s - as ostensibly transcribed and
commented upon by Violet Brown, the North Carolinian spinster who acts as his
secretary.
A nobody who witnesses the crushing of the Bonus Army and becomes
a somebody through his best-selling novels of the Aztec Empire, along the way Shepherd
establishes himself within the household of Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo while
they shelter the exiled Trotsky from Stalin’s hatchet-men. These associations bring him up before the
post-war House un-American Activities Committee.
No sensible person can really accept the red-rose-tinted character
of benevolent Trotsky, as presented here and, yes, Big Bad duplicitous Daddy
Yank lurks again but, really, this doesn’t detract very much at all from such a
rich, well-crafted, novel.
Whatever happened to
Leon Trotsky?
He got an ice pick
That made his ears burn
He got an ice pick
That made his ears burn
No comments:
Post a Comment